Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1988


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. --Core desat 06:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1988

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm struggling to find some sort of verification that this MuchMusic countdown show is in any way an official music chart in Canada. The main Countdown article offers nothing, at it is entirely original research. If these number-ones are not derived by record sales or radio airplay, how are all of these lists notable? Couldn't the same be said for, example, a list of number-one videos on TRL? - eo 01:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Also nominated for the same reason MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1989, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1990, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1991, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1992, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1993, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1994, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1995, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1996, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1997, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1998, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 1999, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2000, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2001, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2002, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2003, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2004, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2005, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2006, MuchMusic Countdown number-one videos of 2007. Mystache 02:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. Would it be possible for all these be made to one entry? It would make the process much easier. Mystache 02:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how to do that. If someone knows how, that'd be great. - eo 02:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll get on it. Mystache 02:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate that! - eo 11:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete because these kinds of articles make me cry. Oh, and because they're indiscriminate information that's merely listing various song lists.  It's not that much more encyclopedic than zip codes or phone directories.  FrozenPurpleCube 03:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The L-word. JuJube 04:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If we have this thing for the Billboard Hot 100, then why is this being AFD'd? contygugsa295talk 06:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Response - Because the Billboard Hot 100 (and various major Billboard charts), as well as other charts that represent a country (UK Singles Chart, Australia's ARIA Charts, etc.) are official, i.e. these are charts based upon radio airplay and record/digital sales. There is some validity behind them, aside from their impact on popular culture (and I don't feel those lists are indiscriminate).  Who is ever going to do a search to find out what video was #1 on MuchMusic's countdown in August 1991?  And who even makes up those charts?  The execs at MuchMusic? - eo 11:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Listcruft. Oh, and that's a lot of articles. ¿ςפקι Д Иτς! ☺ ☻ 14:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Interestingly, the national charts seem to have lost all relevance in their own right. See this article or this week's chart. There aren't even enough physical singles sales to compile a top 20 anymore. –Unint 23:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Banish the lot as being a catalogue. Ohconfucius 07:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.