Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muckety


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Muckety

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Website without sufficient notability Passportguy (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Very interesting. Doesn't seem to be a very active website and based purely on policy I would have to lean towards weak delete based on lack of notability. But it might be nice to include at least a mention somewhere. It's an interesting (radical? impractical?) approach to news coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - I think the NYTimes and Economist refs are good enough. JohnCD (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.