Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mud Bowl (Green Bay Packers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Mud Bowl (Green Bay Packers)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete: Lack of reliable sources in the article Richiekim (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 25.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  21:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 18:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, fails GNG – Muboshgu (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing I can find for it being "notable" is that it was a NFC Divisional Playoff game, that the field was muddy due to conditions, and that it helped the Packers win Super Bowl XXXI. Since there are other games that likely fit this, I would say goodbye to the article.  204.106.251.214 (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. I don't believe I'd ever heard of it before seeing this AfD. AutomaticStrikeout 18:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably Delete no reliable sources...doesn't distinguish itself from any other playoff game per WP:RUNOFTHEMILL--Go Phightins! (talk) 02:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.