Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudassir Iqbal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Mudassir Iqbal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same rationale, below:



Cricketers who fail WP:NCRIC. While they have represented the national team, they have only played in matches in a qualifying tournament, and not a regional final or final qualifying event.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. South Korea did not qualify for the next qualification stage (which has t20 International status), with South Korea not scheduled to play any t20 International matches for some time. So sadly, these guys fail WP:CRIN. Refreshing to see an associate playing mostly homegrown talent though. StickyWicket (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all not notable enough at this time. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nomination. There are far too many athlete stubs which meet their sport criteria and not GNG, nevermind those which meet neither.    SITH   (talk)   11:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - My usual disclaimer. Will these players (theoretically) become notable over time with regard to the new CRIN guidelines? If these players are non-notable now but will become notable later, we need to make sure they are not speedied later under CSD G4 when they do become notable. As for Strauss' WP:IDONTLIKEIT protestations, please cite an actual, workable, NPOV guideline which permits this anti-NPOV opinion... bored deletionism based on POV criteria plucked out of the air destroys any project. I am saddened by the messages on Palaciosus' user talk page, though. "I dream of horses" appears to have zero respect for this user's work, and instead of thanking him/her for the new articles, castigates him/her for not "work[ing] on the articles [they] have already written" - especially when it would seem, currently, to be hard to write more - and when, in any case, they do not pass CRIN. Perhaps the user so critical of the other's work should put in some legwork themselves instead of criticizing others for contributing... Bobo. 12:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - a supplementary thought - are female IT20 cricketers now notable under the new criteria? If so, how strange that we have female cricketers who meet the refreshed CRIN guidelines (such as here) before their male counterparts do. Bobo. 12:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete all None demonstrate notability through multiple non-trivial sources. Reywas92Talk 23:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all none are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.