Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muesli belt malnutrition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Possible merge can be discussed on the talk page, but it seems there is consensus to keep in this discussion. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 02:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Muesli belt malnutrition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

one-off neologism Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 15:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge There are no new words here and the topic seems valid.  It might be incorporated into some more general article such as high residue diet but that's ordinary editing, not deletion. Andrew D. (talk) 11:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, can be referenced, a handful citations have been added, meets WP:GNG, and is not a "one-off" term judging from four decades of sources. Coined sometimes before 1988, it hardly a neologism either. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as there's seems to be enough convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  00:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge, probably to fad diet. That there are "no new words" obviously doesn't mean it's not a neologism, but regardless there seem to be enough sources to merit including somewhere. The problem as far as it having its own article is that the sources I see using it do so as a catchall for "people trying to 'eat healthy' but not actually eating all that healthy". In other words, it's a neologism for a concept that, in use, isn't all that clearly defined as distinct from various other terms. It seems mainly focused on falling into health fads (no carbs, no fats, etc.), which is why I say fad diet. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 00:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.