Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqi Qadri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR -Scottywong | soliloquize _ 23:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Muhammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqi Qadri

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Personal biography of non famous person Aliabbas aa (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - needs inline citations, but appears to meet notability guidelines. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How exactly? SL93 (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Notability_(academics), point 4 (his books are commonly used as textbooks in India and Pakistan); WP:AUTHOR; WP:ANYBIO, point 2. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nom should clearly state his case for lack of notability, because I don't see it. Roodog2k (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment How can it be a personal biography of somebody who died fifty years ago and thus 39 years before Wikipedia existed? Keresaspa (talk) 18:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found no sources to verify any of the information. SL93 (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's nearly all in the external inks at the bottom of the page, especially this one. The quality of those sources is another matter but they do exist. Keresaspa (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There are those links, but I don't waste time reading obvious useless sources. That website is bias as it is from the organization Correct Islamic Faith. I also don't know their qualifications for accurate information. SL93 (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Perhaps, more information about this individual might be found in books, as opposed online. Thunderite (talk) 17:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yes there are a lot of non English sources available that are not found online, this does not necessarily mean that the person is not famous or is not influential. The person who placed the deletion tag seems to have a biased view of the author, he must remember that his personal view does not count here. He is stressing that it is an unimportant article of an unimportant person. For him he maybe unimportant but there maybe a lot of people who came to know about the author via wikipedia. Limitedversion (talk) 31 May 2012.  —Preceding undated comment added 14:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  02:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - References are external,article needs citations, but This does not necessarily means that the person is not notable or influential. The personality is very famous in Hyderabad (India). Most of the resources are in Urdu (hard copies) and not electronically available at the moment but there has been efforts to do that, hence the article may lack precise citations. I am sure all the references will be available soon and henceforth citations will be made precisely. I urge wikipedia not to delete this page.Shafi Chishti (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2012 (CEST)


 * Keep - Abdul Qadeer Siddqi is the most famous person in India, he is known as the ocean of knowledge and he he is the professor of arabic in osmania university. I urge Wikipedia not to delete this page.Azamuddin Mohammed (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2012 (AST)
 * While I'm inclined to agree that he is notable (and the article worth keeping), saying that he is the most famous person in India is pushing it a bit, don't you think? Put it another way, if he were indeed the most famous person in India we wouldn't be having this debate. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - A lot of non-English references are available which have not been produced online but this does not mean that the personality is not famous or is 'unimportant' (as quoted by the person placing the deletion tag). So please keep this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddiqui qadri (talk • contribs) 07:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.