Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Aqib Jamil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Muhammad Aqib Jamil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unfortunately I could not find coverage in reliable sources to expand this article or keep it intact. The references cited within it are mostly social media links.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 07:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Kindly view the new added details and references. Invited as a panelist on Fail Faire vol.2 , guest on Radio Pakistan station Dhanak FM 94.  Hosting Make Music Day Bedroom Studios. Aj316420 (talk) 11:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Please note social media pages are not an acceptable source to prove notability on Wikipedia. Consider providing reliable, tertiary sources like newspapers, television coverage and magazines for example. Making a guest appearance on radio is not by any means notable. You may refer to WP:GNG to get a better idea of what is considered notable. Best regards,  Mar4d  ( talk ) 12:36, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The source link which was provided for Make Music Day Bedroom Studios is a not social media link. A fellow music producer J. Dash is also listed there. It’s their official page link and Make Music Day is presented by NAMM foundation, biggest foundation of music. And television coverage sources were already present in the page.  Aj316420 (talk) 15:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer: Aj316420 has an undisclosed COI with respect to the nominated article and is the article's only contributor. Juliette Han (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The only interest here is for the public to get a unified reliable information and which is provided. Also anyone is welcome to contribute. Thank you Aj316420 (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * FYI: If you contribute to Wikipedia about yourself in any manner, you should disclose your conflict of interest. This discussion is not an exception. You may want to know why it is not encouraged in general. Thank you too. Juliette Han (talk) 16:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. General COI declared, kindly review the page again. Aj316420 (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * * Delete Most references at the article right now are from facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube. Unless third-party independent sources replace them, how can it be acceptable per Wikipedia policy? Ngrewal1 (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The third-party independent sources are already present, kindly review them again.   Aj316420 (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you say so, maybe they are! What really matters is....whether Wikipedia community accepts them as such? Hope you take it the right way or my intended way? I am trying my best not to offend you, Sir. ... but can you consider replacing the social media references? I think that might increase your chances of saving this article. Frankly, as we all know, social media references become a 'negative' rather than help you on Wikipedia. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * All of them are the official pages of the esteemed organizations, not some personal accounts. And also kindly have a look at this citation by Wikipedia. Aj316420 (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails any notability criteria. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Please elaborate any notability criteria which it fails. Thank you Aj316420 (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.