Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Khurram Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Muhammad Khurram Khan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

orhpan, unreferenced and without notability for more than 3 months. -Xmhaoyu (talk) 07:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A Google Scholar search finds a very respectable number of papers and citations for a 2006 PhD, so the subject may well become notable in a few years if he keeps up the good work, but he doesn't appear to be there yet. I would very much doubt that a research group founded by a recent PhD and assistant professor is "one of the leading research groups in China". This claim needs high-quality sources if it to be accepted. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply does not meet any notability criteria. This is a strong delete.Johndowning (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.