Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Riswan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Muhammad Riswan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Falls under WP:BLP1E and notability cannot be proven. The reason for all of the news coverage is the current frenzy around him;his Instagram reel had over 350 million views. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Dance,  and Football.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Will these WP:ANYBIO-(Freestyler)] A champion in WFFA) and As such there are sources where the article is a WP:SPORTSPERSON pass, and Article as an Instagram record holder WP:BLP1E notability policies be included to keep this article, if it passes I think the article should be kept. Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Since you wrote the article yourself, I would like to let you know that you are adhering to wrong notability guidelines. WP:ANYBIO states that the person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times; or the person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field or the person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary. Being a champion of World Freestyle Football Association is not considered a major achievement. According to WP:SPORTSPERSON, a sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The subject is not even a professional footballer. Entire coverage is because of his one viral Instagram reel (WP:BLP1E). Thilsebatti (talk) 14:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Entire article is based on a Instagram reel. Page is being used to show the record only. killer  bee    09:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Instagram reel record a considerable WP:BLP1E notability potential ???--Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 10:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You have wrong understanding about WP:BLP1E. It states that being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article. We generally should avoid having an article on a person when reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event and the person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Every single source is about his viral Instagram reel. You should also read Run-of-the-mill. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Does this article have a WP:BLP1E notability potential?? --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, almost all references are about his Instagram reels. Kkb091 (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Isn't this person a WP:BLP1E quantifier of owning individual reels views on Instagram(405+ millions)? --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry not on reels but reel. Kkb091 (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.