Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure)  J 947 ( c ) (m)   19:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tamgha-e-Imtiaz is fourth in level so certainly not enough. No widespread coverage for his achievements. Fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  15:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:PROF on multiple criteria. Highly cited (#C1), elected fellow of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences (#C3), distinguished professor (#C5). –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm dubious of the "highly cited" claim — for theoretical physics, on the international stage, these are not particularly impressive citation counts. But the distinguished professor title does it. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Joe. Only 178 people in the Pakistan Academy of Sciences. Galobtter (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I think keep to this article.Pakistani Wikipedian (talk)
 * Keep per Joe above. Being among select few in Learned Academy clearly guarantees WP:GNG and those listed by Joe above. –Ammarpad (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.