Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sheeraz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW Guy (Help!) 18:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Muhammad Sheeraz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN.  M A A Z     T A L K   10:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The subject is a current member of a provincial legislature and thus pass speciality notability guideline WP:POLITICIAN. What made you say "Article does not cite reliable sources." Its amusing that the websites of KP Assembly and the Express Tribune does not deem reliable to you. Government websites are primary but are not prohibited and can be safely used for verification purpose. --Saqib (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. I read WP:BEFORE and yes, primary sources can be cited to support content in the article but not to establish notability. Express Tribune is definitely a reliable source but I have said in my nomination that there is no significant coverage in RS except a mention.  M A A Z     T A L K   20:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Saqib (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * keep Again, this article clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN, and is necessary to reduce the structural bias against non-European people on Wikipedia.Jwslubbock (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Elected member of provincial assembly, verified by page from that assembly. Clearly notable. Pam  D  10:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.