Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhd Syafiq Ahmad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  16:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Muhd Syafiq Ahmad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested by article creator, no reason given. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. According to this he has only played in the Malaysia Premier League which is not a fully-professional league. No significant coverage, in fact very little coverage at all, I've struggled to find sources. GiantSnowman 11:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC) \

Okay, Mr. Snowman. First of all, if the Malaysia Premier League was not a fully-professional league, then I want you to nominate for deletion of ALL the players and coach articles in the league. Second, if you couldn't find a source, google the player's name. Probably because he is not popular so he does not has much sources... And I expect you to nominate to delete ALL the recently made football player articles because they are all not popular and don't have much source. PS: I have placed a link to the sources I got. Third, Kedah FA will be playing in the Malaysia Super League next season. Which is a fully-professional league. So what is your say, Mr. Snowman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hewkiivorox (talk • contribs)
 * There are other non-notable articles on Wikipedia? WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. He might be notable in the future? WP:CRYSTAL. GiantSnowman 14:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay, Mr. Snowman. I need you to leave this article alone for a few months, because he is a rising star in the league. He will have many more sources later in one or two years... So please Mr. GiantSnowman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hewkiivorox (talk • contribs) 15:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning in the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Hahaha... That is funny, if that is so, why don't you nominate to delete all the second division player articles out there? And second, for god's sake his team will play in a fully-professional league next season.
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. COmments above that he's bound to be notable in time are pure WP:CRYSTAL. The article can be recreated if / when he actually satisfies a guideline. Fenix down (talk) 12:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Oh, can't you wait until next season? Deleting this page solves nothing if they will play in a fully-professional league next season. You deleted it, I have to recreate it next season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hewkiivorox (talk • contribs) 00:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy - While presently failing WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG, I note that Kedah FA will be promoted to Malaysia Super League next season. If the subject is still attached to the club and plays next season, then he would meet WP:NFOOTY, but we cannot keep the article in mainspace due to WP:CRYSTALBALL. Userfying will both remove the article from mainspace while allowing to maintain and update it until it meets the requirements to be added to mainspace. If, however, the subject is not notable after a period of time, then Hewkiivorox is always free to add db-u1 to the draft. — Jkudlick t c s 15:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.