Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muichertach O'Brien


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 05:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Muichertach O'Brien
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable third-party references to establish notability, article is malformed and poorly written. Original author repeatedly removed refimprove and cleanup templates. Note the Mathghamhain O'Brien article was written by the same person. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 01:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep See comments at Articles for deletion/Mathghamhain O'Brien and a source which is consistent with articles, though far from enough to support everything, but shows there were father and son kings of these names at that time.John Z (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, ditto. You are supposed to help these articles improve, not nominate in bulk within 48 hours. That seems much like biting the newbie, to me. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not biting the newbie. I'm not nominating in bulk. I attempted multiple times to place templates on the pages asking for references, cleanup, etc., which were then simply deleted the the original author with no real attempt to clean up the articles or add references per WP:N and WP:RS. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 23:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Sources exist, clearly notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.