Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Muine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable run-of-the-mill media player. Article mostly consists of a list of features, nothing unique. Miami33139 (talk) 03:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - It isn't notable (in my opinion), doesn't demonstrate notability, and doesn't claim notability and has no sources. I believe it to be blatant advertising (CSD G11).  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 07:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. States and demonstrates notability in article text. Please, let's stop this insane deletion nomination of every audio software that happens to be currently a stub, or underdeveloped.  WP:NOTE is about whether the topic itself is notable (as this obviously is), not about whether the current article is perfect!  LotLE × talk  23:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The reason this is notable is the fact that it's written in a relatively new stack for Linux (Mono). It's the same reason Tomboy is notable, even though it really sucks rocks as a note taking app. § FreeRangeFrog 00:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That is an understandable claim to uniqueness. However, that's not our definition of notable.  Have multiple reliable sources independent of the subject paid attention to this software because of that unique attribute?  I am trying to find sources before nominating these.  All I can find for Muine are blogs and forums.  We must reflect notability by measuring the rest of the world, not direct notability by including what the world has ignored.  Without independent judgment of notability, our inclusion based on our claim of notability becomes a collective Original Research. Miami33139 (talk) 01:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - reading through Ghits shows that it's frequently compared to the other, more-popular media players. There's a supported packaging of it for Ubuntu here.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.