Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir's razor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 20:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Muir's razor
Idiocy. Also, neologism. DS 18:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. brilliantly stupid.  sp 00n 17 :color="#555577">talk 02:53, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Isotope23 18:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per 25 google hits. Punkmorten 19:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is such a common thing that I think people need to know about it.--StephenJMuir 22:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. You, apparently as the "Muir" whom coined the phrase, are in no position to write an encyclopedic NPOV article about it, even if it were notable. We wouldn't allow Tiger Woods to write an article about himself, either. --Agamemnon2 11:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom (add "vanity" to the list). --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 12:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * For the record, it was me that coined the phrase, but I did not write the original article, nor did I ask anybody else to. StephenJMuir 17:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't want to sound over-sceptical, but you and the anon who created the article appeared at the same time, and have edited little else. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sigh.  I didn't really want to get drawn into this, but I created the article.  You have been using Occam's razor rather than Muir's razor :)  D McCanney 22:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.