Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujhe Pyar Hua Tha (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Mujhe Pyar Hua Tha
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing has changed since the AfD w/r/t sourcing and this was moved back after an AfC decline. If this closes again as draftify, suggest SALT to enforce AfC. Star  Mississippi  15:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan.  Star   Mississippi  15:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources don't come even close to satisfying GNG, and this has had plenty of time for better sources to be added, therefore the fact that they remain absent implies there are none to be found. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as the show does have multiple sources available on Google search though they're not added into the article, adequate to satisfy WP:GNG and WP: Notability.Lillyput4455 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: previously draftified and proded, no improvement, unreliable sources, nothing found about it except in social media sites. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, too early to delete. The series have been recognized as a popular show in South Asian region. There are many websites citing WP: Notability of the show not included in the article. If the nominator would have searched it and added them in the articles, it would have been much better case. Even sources cited in the article covers WP:SIGCOV. Plus there are 10+ sources not cited appearing in Google. Agreed with User:Lillyput4455. TheAnasKhan (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 10+ sources: Its more than 10 but all are unreliable and review blogposts, some are with name drop mentions with actor's other projects. Recognition and popularity in South Asian region isn't the policy guideline. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you think sources from Daily Pakistan, The News International, Independent Urdu, DAWN, ARY News are unreliable sources? You need to study more guidelines then. Lillyput4455 (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per nom. Sourced with unreliable gossip-type sources. 2400:ADC1:468:400:7DD6:C651:21F1:A243 (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep : It have adequate sources sufficient to denote WP: Notability. 111.88.33.72 (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nominator, fair amount of fluff sources and routine sources, but not the good quality in depth sources.  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: The IP @111.88.33.72 participating in AfDs of different Pakistani TV serials most probably a sock of an active account. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: The IP @2400:ADC1:468:400:7DD6:C651:21F1:A243 participating in AfDs of different Pakistani TV serials most probably a sock of an active account. TheAnasKhan (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * CU note Lillyput4455 and TheAnasKhan are both socks of the same blocked user. The IPv4 !vote struck through above is also evading a block, though no comment on which accounts it is related to. I don't know anything about the IPv6 IP above. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.