Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukatsuku Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Nik Weston. ansh 666 17:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Mukatsuku Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Current references are to non-notable publications / soundcloud. The external links also given concern toward self-promotion. A WP:BEFORE showed much the same. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  05:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:19, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I think some of the information could be merged to its owners page, Nik Weston. The studio doesn't warrant a stand-alone article. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 06:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect: Ernestchuajiasheng had a point, this article are not very WP:independent, got one reference source had been WP:404. Since Mukatsuku Records is the owner of Nik Weston, partly materials it could be merge and redirect. SA 13 Br<b style="color:violet">o</b> (talk) 07:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect: I agree, at this stage. Though the detail is nice to have on WP with reasonable accurateness, I don't think it warrants its own page. As per normal for smaller topics, the links were very throwaway and have no archived versions (the "JellyJazz" one was a club night in Plymouth, Devon, UK), hence have gone down. Jimthing (talk) 09:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. Non-controversial, so completed move to save time with some quickie tidying, given three people have said same thing for a small article. Jimthing (talk) 10:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.