Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukul Sinha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Mukul Sinha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mostly unsourced article about non-notably scientist. The few references that are there (and are not dead links) talk about riots that took place that have questionable connection to the subject of the article. The other 2 sources confirm that the person existed but don't speak to their notability. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I have to admit that I think this AfD is misguided and could have done with a good dose of WP:BEFORE, though I won't !vote as I was the admin who declined the original A7 CSD request.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Just my 2 cents but I don't think that should disqualify you from making a keep vote. -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Meh, I'd prefer not to, even if it is overly cautious. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep the sources say more than the article which is both unusual and slightly confusing. The refs make the claim for notability even though it is rather muted in the article. The many typos and spelling issues don't help in the understanding and it is possible that I may have misconstrued the intended meaning.  Velella  Velella Talk 21:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article already cites enough coverage in independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability and plenty more is found by the searches automatically linked above. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources support the claims. This is just a bootstrap and the article has a potential to grow. Xscontrib (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.