Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mulan (2020 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. See my comment below for more explanation. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Mulan (2020 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This film has been postponed indefinitely and Wikipedia is not supposed to promote it with an article. Georgia guy (talk) 01:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily meets WP:NFILM. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. – FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, film should be kept per WP:NFP. This film has received plenty of reliable and significant coverage and it had already premiered in Hollywood. It would be quite ridiculous to simply delete it. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  02:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if the film is never released, the marketing controversies render it permanently notable. BD2412  T 02:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The nationwide release was postponed, but obviously Disney didn't go to all the trouble and expense of making the movie and then never release it. With this level of significant coverage, even if the studio went insane somehow and never released the film, it would still be notable. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:N, WP:NFILM Dede2008 (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - Easily passes GNG, and WP:NFF is passed because of the controversies with the production/marketing. For some inexplicable reason, this article has been draftified, it needs to be moved back to the mainspace. Hog Farm Bacon 03:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Is this a joke? This easily passes WP:FILM Donaldd23 (talk) 04:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep On top of reaching notability as many have above have said, the idea that the film does not currently have a release date is completely irrelevant to it having an article or not. Once it's safe for theaters to open again, movies like Mulan are going to have much firmer release strategies. HunterAlexBrown (talk) 04:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily passes WP:NFF. I, also, do not understand why this page was nominated for deletion in the first place. Cardei012597 (talk) 05:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unreleased films can be notable as long as there's sufficient coverage to pass WP:NFF, particularly if they have completed or started filming. The odds of this not releasing in some format is slim, given the amount of money and publicity sunk into the movie. As others have said, Disney is likely just waiting for theaters to reopen. If they were to never re-open, they'd probably just release it in some other format, probably as a VOD rental or to their streaming service. I'm going to go ahead and snow close this one. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.