Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mulavelil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Mulavelil
Vanity reference, notabiltity is suspect, unverified matter Patrolling the   ocean called   Wikipedia |Tell me about vandals, violations and more... 15:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The article is totally unverified and not notable at all. Either there is original research which too is suspect or just plain nonsense. Apparently, the article has been created and developed by a single user,. This user also uses the following IP addresses 59.144.106.246, 59.144.98.172, 59.144.101.241, 59.144.100.147, 59.144.105.46, 59.144.97.100, 219.65.81.126, 59.144.96.66.

The article is a personal family history which has been vainly and falsely glorified in order to achieve notability. But I consulted my Indian friends from Kerala about this matter as well as looking up in the net and the library to find about this but couldn't come up with any material. The violations are Vanity page and/or Original research|Original research. There may be other violations as well.

-- Patrolling the  ocean called   Wikipedia |Tell me about vandals, violations and more... 15:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

There is another page which redirects to this article. See Mulavelil (Unnithan Panickers).

-- Patrolling the  ocean called   Wikipedia |Tell me about vandals, violations and more... 18:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:VAIN, WP:OR, WP:V, and Wikipedia is not a Genealogical Directory. All families have ancient histories; not all families are notable. Scorpiondollprincess 16:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:VAIN and Wikipedia is not a Genealogical Directory. I am hardly convinced that it is Original Research.-- N R S(talk to me, mail me   or award me a barnstar) 17:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Wafulz 17:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, is WP:OR, fails WP:V, WP:NOT a genealogical database, and the use of the word "we" in the third sentence makes me think this is WP:VANITY. -- Kinu t /c  21:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Wikipedia is NOT a place to store non-notable family history. Delete as per WP:VANITY, WP:NOT, WP:NN. -- |  Shishir Rane  | talk | 05:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey...well if u all feel all tht has been written above, ur free to delete the article....u have my consent as well Manu


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.