Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multi-syllabic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  06:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Multi-syllabic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real content; no real sense; no real point. Imaginatorium (talk) 13:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Syllable (though the current content would fit in Rhyme or Rhyme scheme)-- Brainy J  ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 14:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.   Brainy J  ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 14:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)




 * Comment Note that the entire content of the page is as follows:
 * Rhyme schemes utilizing copious repetition of phonetically similar syllables.
 * Eminem is a notable example of this scheme.

Could anyone suggest where this "content" might fit into Syllable or Rhyme ? Imaginatorium (talk) 13:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: article is redundant (perhaps too grand a word for such meager content); see Multisyllabic rhymes - Neonorange (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable and unreferenced item. Probable OR. Fiddle   Faddle  02:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete good nom, and per Neonorange. Don't think the content is worth inserting anywhere.--ColonelHenry (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.