Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiAV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

MultiAV

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable proprietary connector with no reliable source. The first 2 reference link to a freely editable wiki. the 3rd and 4th reference to the official website. Paid Editing (talk) 20:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Task mgr (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete google for multiav doesn't really found any thing abt this connector. Salvtied (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect or merge to nintendo if this can be properly sourced, else delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Breast stroke (talk • contribs) 20:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nintendo video game consoles. there will probably be a small number of users searching for the term. Lsy90 (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Paid Editing. Nominator and other !voters were all blocked as socks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've therefore struck all the puppets' !votes. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 12:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 21:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete anyway despite blatant sockpuppetry, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete We should discuss AV Multi (Sony) as well, then. ~ Amory ( user •  talk  •  contribs ) 22:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We are now, see Articles for deletion/AV Multi. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 12:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of real-world context and therefore notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 12:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – Notwithstanding the clear sockpuppetry above, there is nothing here that is reliable that could possibly establish any notability. MuZemike 16:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just want to mention that I came across this page today and found the information useful. The pinout for the connector was valuable, although I guess the source cited might be considered unreliable? The table of which consoles support which output formats was also useful to me. And4e (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merely being of interest doesn't justify inclusion on Wikipedia; all articles have to show notability via the citation of secondary sources, which this currently fails to do. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 21:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: weakly-sourced. Had same observations as nominator. Alexius08 (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.