Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiLoad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Keeper   76  16:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

MultiLoad

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced article which does not assert notabilty -- JediLofty UserTalk 15:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 
 * Neutral: I would say that "The Teradata MultiLoad utility gives users an efficient way to deal with batch maintenance of large databases" is, in fact, an assertion of notability.  What did your research turn up in terms of references?    RGTraynor  16:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge: MultiLoad is one of a set of related utilities from Teradata (listed in the company's article). Looks like there's independent coverage of the Teradata products (apparently including books?).  Since they're so closely related, it might make more sense to have one article on them all, or just to cover them in the article on Teradata.  -- Jaeger5432 | Talk 14:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  JForget  22:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of how this is notable. Dearth of WP:V, WP:RS. Cheers, Dlohcierekim&#39;s sock (talk) 03:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom This is a 1.5 year old article with a total lack of reliable sources. Artene50 (talk) 03:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. The article reads like a product webpage.  I tried to summarize it in my head, but most of the words evaporated like marketing-speak, leaving perhaps two sentences of pretty generic stuff.  The entire suite of utilities should be covered in the company's article anyway, if that is the only major thing they make.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Dmol (talk) 11:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.