Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiclet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  10:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Multiclet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. None of the sources is independent. (The only one that superficially looks as though it might be, www.spacenewsfeed.co.uk, gives its source as Sputnix, a business collaborating with Multiclet.) At a glance, there appear to be plenty of Google hits, but once one weeds out the company's own site, blogs, forums, mere company listing sites, pages that only briefly mention Multiclet, etc etc, and also pages which refer to a completely different meaning of the word "multiclet", not much is left. Google books gives three hits, two of which refer to the other meaning of "multiclet", and the third is a book made up from Wikipedia content. Google scholar gives 4 hits, of which two refer to this meaning of "multiclet", and both of those are on the web site multiclet.com, so they are not independent sources. The article is also somewhat promotional in character. (Note: The article has previously been deleted twice, once by speedy deletion as promotion, and once by PROD.) JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as a promotional article. Alexius08 (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.