Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual version

Multilingual version was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. User:Sj

Multilingual version. Doesn't deserve a disambiguation article. Who would want to disambiguate such an expression? --Edcolins 21:25, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete multilingual version, multilingual website and multilingual software. An article on multilingual media in general would be somewhat interesting, but these are all tiny little lists with no content worth saving. Sean Curtin
 * Delete: I have to generally agree that these are highly unlikely to be useful to our users. It seems to me that the Wiktionary meaning of "multilingual" is going to be enough.  For that matter, "diaglot" and "polyglot" are out there.  This stuff is kind of self-explanatory.  It does no harm to keep these pages, but it does no good, either. Geogre 00:41, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - not remotely useful. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 20:15, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)