Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimedia cloud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Multimedia cloud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a publication of a student paper, falling under the category of original research. The authors are proposing a new design for a thing never before developed. Good idea, but Wikipedia is not the place to publish it. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Delete. I don't think this is a student paper, but rather based on an article in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (full reference below). That article is fairly widely cited, and it might be possible to write something on the topic here (although I don't think it should look much like this one). However, I do not have immediate access to IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, and I suspect the first concern is ensuring that none of this content represents a copyright violation. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have access to this paper and there doesn't appear to be any obvious copyvio concerns. I'm happy to send along a pdf if anyone else would like to take a look.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 17:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As I feared, strict copying and close phrasing from the sole apparent source essentially mandates that we delete this, potentially as a G12 speedy. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As I feared, strict copying and close phrasing from the sole apparent source essentially mandates that we delete this, potentially as a G12 speedy. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. this is not a student paper and none of this content represents a copyright violation then what is the need to delete this artical ?? This artical is fine to publish in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aravinda93 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Pardon my misperception. Phrases included in the article include "we propose an architecture called media-edge cloud" seem to indicate a research paper of some nature, and the fact that I could not find a published source to match (thanks Squeamish for that!) made me assume that it was a student paper. As it is, it appears to be largely a rephrasing of the single paper found by Squeamish, or (since I don't actually have access to that paper to determine the extent of copying) at the very least a large pile of original research. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or move to Drafts namespace - It's a new article undergoing steady improvements, so could likely turn into something good fairly soon, but for now I have to agree that, in addition to the problematic apparent OR and WP:TONE issues, there do appear to be WP:COPYVIO problems (not a direct copy/paste, but extensive WP:Close paraphrasing). See also this slideshow presentation at slideshare which appears to make the same argument using a lot of the same language. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 18:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete because this article looks to me to be filled with WP:COPYVIOs. The original journal article appears to be on slideshare, and comparing the two, the majority of the WP article is composed of sentences and parts of sentences from the journal that have been copied and pasted in the order they originally appeared. Only the last two sections, Multimedia cloud storage and Applications of cloud-aware multimedia, are somewhat originally worded although the original text appears to come from the Storage and Sharing and Cloud-aware multimedia applications sections on page 65, respectively. The rest of the sections and their original locations are:
 * The lead comes from from pages 59 and 60.
 * The fundamental challenges for multimedia computing comes from page 60 (second column, first paragraph).
 * Fundamental concept of multimedia cloud computing comes from page 60 (second column, second paragraph) and Multimedia-aware cloud on page 62.
 * Media cloud computing architecture comes from Media-cloud-computing-architecture on page 62.
 * Distributed parallel multimedia processing comes from Distributed parallel multimedia processing on page 62.
 * Quality of service in media cloud comes from Media Cloud QoS section on pages 64.
 * Ca2james (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Undelete Changes are made in this article so don't delete this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.97.204 (talk) 06:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.