Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimodal cancer therapy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Multimodal cancer therapy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a dictionary entry  DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not. It cites a dictionary entry, but it includes examples in other contexts. It is a stub. TiagoLubiana (talk) 00:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge into cancer treatment article. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 07:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep This is not a dictionary entry.  It's not about a word and contains no etymology, grammar or other lexical details.  The nomination is therefore mistaken as explained by the relevant policy WP:DICDEF, "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry...".  Furthermore, as the topic is highly notable, it is apparent that WP:BEFORE has not been followed.  Here's a selection of books on the topic:
 * Multimodal Therapy in Oncology Nursing
 * Multimodal Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies
 * Multimodal Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
 * Surgery in the Multimodal Management of Gastric Cancer
 * Multimodal Treatment of Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer
 * Multimodal Nanoparticle-based Platforms for Cancer Therapy
 * Multimodality Management of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
 * Surgery in Multimodal Management of Solid Tumors
 * Combination Cancer Therapy
 * Multimodality Therapy in Gynecologic Oncology
 * There are many words here, not one. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Symbol keep vote.svg Keep: I found so many reliable sources ~ Limited Idea4me (talk) 08:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per the significant coverage in the significant number of sources provided above.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 09:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Several sources have been added to the article that allow it to meet WP:GNG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.