Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbai College of Hotel Management and catering technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. So Why  14:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Mumbai College of Hotel Management and catering technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Please state a reason for deletion and complete the nom; despite the lack of reason though, the article is terribly poor and doesn't convey much of anything.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 14:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment this article does not meet to WP:GNG it does not have citations, Reliable, Independent Sources thats the reason I nominate this for WP:AFD I Know I should have gone for WP:A7 But if I have made mistake doing this please correct. -- MrZINE 14:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment You're fine; I don't see any mistakes outside the rationale and forgetting to post to the daily log, so I have nothing to correct here, and your rationale is perfectly valid. Thank you for responding.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 14:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - This page was previously created, and nominated for speedy deletion as G11 and A7, and deleted, and re-created. It could be tagged for CSD again, but we are here, so it can be deleted as no credible claim of significance, which is a lack of notability.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.