Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbai Gullies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 08:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Mumbai Gullies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article is not notable. A recent revision reads like an advertisement. A revert today by another editor has the text as a stub. Although it has references, I am not sure this makes it notable (per WP:PRODUCT). Further the subject was supposed to be finished in 2021, there seems to be no further update. The production company is not notable enough to have a WP page. I propose deleting this page, and will also make the same case for the 2 other games linked. Master Of Ninja (talk) 07:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete It's non-notable currently and lacks reliable sourcing and significant coverage, given all the sources mention it trivially. Also WP:TOOSOON for an unreleased game. Could draftify if more sources are found. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and India.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * .Delete. Lack of reliable sources. RomanRaju (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify As probably WP:TOOSOON. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom does not meet GNG.Tame Rhino (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.