Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumm-Ra the Ever-Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Mumm-Ra the Ever-Living

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Not only is Mumm-Ra notable, but so is our coverage of him. See The Wonderful World of Wikipedia which states Where else can you quickly find facts about the stages of glycolysis one second and Mumm-Ra (the demonic wizard and arch nemesis of the ThunderCats) the next?. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think the line you're quoting is meant to show he is utterly trivial, Colonel.   SIS   20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Send back to his Black Pyramid per nom.   SIS   20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to ThunderCats. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 21:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ThunderCats. Not enough verifiable secondary sources to stand on its own per WP:FICT; however, the ThunderCats article also has some issues as well (only two sources in a article weighing in more than 67 KB). MuZemike  ( talk ) 22:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment How is the Daily Illini like an AfD discussion? Because they both judge by how nonsensical the names of the articles sound. DGG (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Thundercats unless sufficient sourcing can be found to justify a seperate article. Edward321 (talk) 04:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.