Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mun Quan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Mun Quan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was this professor sufficiently notable? I can't discern any real notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Even with the Askart page, Quan is not notable enough IMHO to rectify inclusion. SarahStierch (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to fail WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.