Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munchy's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Davewild (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Munchy&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article contains a large amount of unsubstantiated information as well as a lot of promotional/advertising content Suannyip (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve/copy edit. Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:
 * Grounded on reliable systems for smooth operations. Originally published in New Straits Times.
 * Building a good image. New Straits Times.
 * Munchy Food expands exports. New Straits Times.
 * Munchy eyeing European market following ISO 22000 certification. Originally published in The Star.
 * TheStar: Munchy’s does Malaysia proud. Marketing (magazine)
 * – N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:CORPDEPTH per sources listed above by User:Northamerica1000. Cavarrone 10:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination lists issues that can be dealt with by editing but no valid reason for deletion. Coverage is sufficient to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 11:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.