Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mungyodance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Mungyodance

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Would being a slightly-well-known Stepmania-based game inherit its notability? Sorry, its worth a mention on the Stepmania page as how far you can go when you mess with StepMania, but sorry guys, I'll let you decide its fate. ViperSnake151 21:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

So the reason why the entry should be deleted is .. ? Magi 08:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.165.166.21 (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   — Beloved  Freak  21:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not cite reliable published sources, thus it doesn't assert notability, which is grounds for deletion. ViperSnake151 18:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just to confirm: Did you research the subject, or act entirely on the basis of the article's current state? --Kiz o r  01:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 22:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The game would certianly be the most notable of the Stepmania based freeware games. However, is a freeware game of this level truly notable for Wikipedia? I would honestly say yes, if only at the bare minimum, but I can see why this would be up for deletion. Is this truely any different, however, from In The Groove? In many ways, no: It simply is designed to be freely available, adverse to ITG, which was designed as a commercial product. Also, as a developer of a similar freeware stepmania based project, I know the effort it takes for a person to actually create something original based on it: This being the best example in the non commercial sector: and for that it is notable enough. Nothing else may rank, but I think this does, if ONLY by a tiny ammount. KurisuYamato (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not one single reference or proof of notability. &mdash; flamingspinach | (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete. The upcoming third game was featured on the Bemanistyle, quite literally the largest Rhythm/Dance/Music game site in the world. --ToyoWolf (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete This is an excellent example of a free, yet commercial quality game coming from a high-quality, up-and-coming independent record label, and is also from a well-known "furry" DJ. Just my two cents. ~Ark =^-^= (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, article tagged for Rescue. May also add sites and references.


 * Delete Only citation leads to a message board log-in, lacks the multiple in-depth reliable sources needed to demonstrate notability. A search is turning up nothing. Someoneanother 09:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.