Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muni Jayanandvijay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Muni Jayanandvijay

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails to address WP:BIO or WP:AUTHOR. Jayanandvijay is not credited on Satya Ki Khoj and I find no (non-circular) references on GBooks and no matches on GNews. Fæ (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 06:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Claimed notability is not verifiable. Nitalake (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Did you check Hephaestus Books review on him? Or Books LLC's publication on him?  Wifione  Message 10:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Books LLC make most of their books by copying articles out of Wikipedia categories, and this would seem to be no exception - everything listed in the title seems to have come straight out of Category:Jain monks by nationality. I haven't heard of Hephaestus Books before, but that one looks like it might be something similar. Alzarian16 (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Wifione, please be aware of these sort of printed mirrors. See Hephasaestus Books and Books LLC. The fact that you are pointing to these as the best sources you can find is quite a good argument for deletion. --Fæ (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest Googling Hephaestus Books, and you'll find things like http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=6829 (and possibly worse...). Peridon (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Apart from a widely parroted piece about him opening something or other, there seems little or nothing like a reliable independent source in the first 10 Google search pages (with minuses removing Hephaestus and Wikipedia). The book quoted in the first reference has two hits on the Karlsruhe cataloguing, and the second one has very little for the publisher. Altogether, not a lot going for it. Peridon (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.