Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Municipal elections in Conil de la Frontera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Municipal elections in Conil de la Frontera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very localized city council election results. wp:not, prod removed by article creator with the Wikipedia is not paper rationale, a merge looks probable, but likely to be contested by article creator so sending it here for discussion. Delete Pokerkiller (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No notability whatsoever. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: the results get published by national news orgs so a case could be made for GNG; but every other Spanish municipality gets published as well and WP isn't an elections results database.Vrac (talk) 00:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete local elections are non-notable, that the number 1 newspaper has a link to the countries election department where all results can be checked, doesn't make it notable, it is a "primary source", nothing was written about the election, I suppose they get local WP:ROUTINE coverage Kraxler (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.