Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munik Nunes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per relatively low participation herein. Regarding the keep !vote, of note is that criteria at WP:ENT does not guarantee presumed notability. Atop the section of the guideline page, it states that people "are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." North America1000 10:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Munik Nunes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is a poorly translated biography of somebody that became famous solely for participating of a TV show. There is no other sourced event that could justify any claim of relevance. Perhaps the article could be redirected to the specific season she participated. —Teles « Talk to me ˱ M @ C S ˲» 17:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as still questionable, despite the pageant, for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep She would seem to meet the notability threshold of having "a large fan base or a significant 'cult' following" with her 2.2 million followers on Instagram. giso6150 (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

There was use of arguments. However, the use of these arguments do not have assessed in light uncontested consensus for the article. So I close the discussion. Amamos Anitta  Discussion 18h49m, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Consensus Conclusion
 * Comment - Note that I nearly covered this or altogether removed because it's the actual article author therefore they cannot actually "close" and it's also not a vote.... SwisterTwister   talk  05:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * As for the "Keep" vote, it could be keepable because of that but that's only expected coverage and there's still nothing to noticeably solve the current independent questionability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.