Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munna Bhai Chale Amrika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Munna Bhai (film series). Tito Dutta (talk) 12:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Munna Bhai Chale Amrika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is non-existent film. I was unable to find anything in the searches. No sources at all. The release date 29 June 2022 (as mentioned in the article) is way too long. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment It says part 4 in he article, but the title of the article "Munna Bhai Chale Amrika" is perhaps a misspelling of the upcoming third part which seems to have the name: Munna Bhai Chale Amerika (see here or here) so maybe it is a misspelling? There is also a trailer for the third installment of this series on youtube. Coverage of the third part is also not very convincing though, as it is scheduled for 2017 or 2018. Dead Mary (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect - an IP editor brought this article out of a redirect, and created it with the AfD template. So he's nominating it for deletion? The user has demonstrated questionable judgment across a number of articles, and has brought numerous redirects back into articles prematurely and in several cases contravening WP:NFF. If this article doesn't get deleted it should be redirected, because he has not demonstrated that principal photography has begun. He's made many sloppy mistakes, so it's also possible he is recreating an existing article under an incorrectly spelled title. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.