Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murarka College, Sultanganj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep(non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Murarka College, Sultanganj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From what I can tell its just a unit of a college, which was also apparently previously deleted. Wgolf (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. We generally keep degree-level institutions, which this is. It was founded as an independent college and became a constituent college of a larger university twenty years later. However, it is still an autonomous college. We haven't yet deleted the article on (e.g.) Christ's College, Cambridge, also a constituent college of a larger university, have we? -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment-well I'm unfamiliar with this school so I couldn't tell exactly what this was-I was not sure to put one up to be honest until I read that it was deleted before. Wgolf (talk) 14:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It was deleted as a WP:COPYVIO, not for notability reasons. It probably shouldn't have been deleted at all, as the subject is clearly notable; the copyrighted material should just have been stripped out. And there's therefore no reason why it can't be recreated without the copyrighted material. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Withrdawn-Well thanks for that-I would of left it alone had I known any of that ha. But as one comment had on the user page was "Why recreate a article that will be speedied again" so yep! Wgolf (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.