Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Karagöz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Murat Karagöz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not pass WP:GNG. Kadı   Message   17:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aintabli (talk) 05:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Hope to see some editors join this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Turkey.  Kadı    Message   17:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations,  and Turkey. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mongolia, Jordan,  and Portugal.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Here's a story about a talk he gave: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkiye/need-for-effective-communication-by-governments-stressed-at-global-summit/2754671 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep – Subject clearly meets WP:GNG criteria with lots of Turkish articles about him and his activities. I have added a couple of them to the article. Kind regards. Wikipractitioner (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC) <-- Confirmed sock of User:TEB001 Aintabli (talk) 18:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. There appears to be enough secondary sources with independent significant coverage already cited in the article to pass WP:GNG. Without a source analysis from the nominator, I am not seeing a strong argument for deletion.4meter4 (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The deletion rationale was that the article did not meet WP:GNG. With the 11 sources (up from 5 at nomination) currently in the article, it meets GNG. Jacona (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.