Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder Among Friends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Murder Among Friends

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. The play looks like it could be notable, as there are a lot of hits on the Google News Archive.  However, the film is very difficult to source.  I saw this article that talks a bit about how the play was adapted into a television film.  But there doesn't seem to be much in the way of reviews.  Maybe our Wikipedia article could be made to about the play instead, and then mention the film adaptation. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * An excellent find and good point. There is no reason that the article cannot cover both the play and the film. I have stated so below in my "keep".  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable play and adaptation.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * type/year:
 * type/year:
 * film's director:
 * playwright:
 * film's star:
 * film's star:


 * Keep per meeting WP:NF through available sources. I remind the nominator that a topic's notability is dependent upon sources being available and never upon their ever being used. THAT's a matter for regular editing, and it does not improve the project to delete an arguably notable topic simply because it may start out looking poor.  We fix. The stage play has coverage to meet WP:GNG and so does the film. WP:BEFORE? WP:IMPROVE,  WP:WIP, WP:IMPERFECT. It will serve the project if the article were to be expanded to cover both the notable stage play and the resulting film of the same name.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The film/play has quite a few hits on Google News . There's easily enough sources out there for the subject to meet WP:GNG. Sure, the article needs work, but instead of being deleted, it should be improved.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 00:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, but also WP:BURDEN. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.