Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jason Gage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 10:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Murder of Jason Gage

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A sad tale lacking notability  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 12:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:CRIME notability criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No real indication of notability. --BDD (talk) 18:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete While it would meet GNG, I couldn't make any progress on establishing persistent coverage or lasting effects here (and thus I have a difficult time arguing this meets WP:EVENT). --j⚛e deckertalk 18:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG. I'll also look for more sources. Insomesia (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reflist does indicate some degree of sustained, non-local interest. In any event, it's hard to imagine that this contributes less to the sum of human knowledge than an article on a street or a YouTube "star" or the bestselling video game du jour. Rivertorch (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It wasn't clear when I voted that this was an LGBT-related crime. I'm striking my vote and abstaining. --BDD (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, good amount of coverage from secondary sources that satisfy WP:RS. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - it made National news and ongoing analysis. Bearian (talk) 21:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.