Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This fails WP:GNG. Horrible as it is, was, for the victim and for those who loved them, WP:NOTNEWS applies. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime, England,  and Venezuela.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: The murder has had important coverage in Spanish: but there doesn't seem to have been further repercussions. I tried looking for statements from diplomatic or government officials per WP:SUSTAINED, to no avail. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Article is based on news reports from when the crime took place and the subsequent court case; both of which could be viewed as primary sources. There needs to be further discussion and analysis of this crime in reliable sources to make it notable per WP:NEVENT — Does have an international aspect (Britain/Venezuela)   but doesn't seem to have had an impact on, for example, the countries relations. Haven't found reliable sources demonstrating a lasting WP:EFFECT. This from the essay WP:NOTABLENEWS sums up the situation with this article: . Maybe a bit harsh as this murder obviously has a severe impact and is not forgotten by close relatives and friends of the deceased, but it's coverage of the wider context that Wikipedia is concerned with and that's what is lacking here. Rupples (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.