Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Vishwanath Shetty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 19:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Murder of Vishwanath Shetty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable person for single event. Does not meet WP:NCRIME Whiteguru (talk) 22:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime,  and India. Whiteguru (talk) 22:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep WP:NCRIME really just tells us to make sure there are good sources (I think there are) and directs us to the full guidance at WP:CRIME. WP:CRIME, as I read it, cautions against a separate article for the person (all good, that's not the situation here), cautions about BLP compliance (I think this is fine, but will update my !vote if someone says otherwise) and that it's well documents (I think it is, there are multiple news sources). So to me, I think it's in line with the guidelines, which supplement the WP:GNG, which I think is met. But if I've missed something, please specifically tell me how and I'll revisit my !vote CT55555 (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

NCRIME is in the EVENT page. This may pass WP:EVENT as there are articles from 2015 and 2022, so durability is there. And there were section 144 after murder.

If an article passes NEVENT but fails NCRIME, then such articles should be deleted? And how is this biography article as the nominator is saying? Ivan Tsar (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

NCRIME thus does not provide any distinct grounds for deletion. -- Visviva (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. A merge might be appropriate if there is a suitable target, but the nom makes no argument for deletion. Facially, this article seems to cite to ample independent reliable sources to meet the threshold of WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT. As for WP:NCRIME, in its current entirety that section reads as follows:"*:Articles about criminal acts,[5] particularly those that fall within the category of "breaking news", are frequently the subject of deletion discussions. As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources.
 * The disappearance of a person would fall under this guideline if law enforcement agencies deemed it likely to have been caused by criminal conduct, regardless of whether a perpetrator is identified or charged. If a matter is deemed notable, and to be a likely crime, the article should remain even if it is subsequently found that no crime occurred (e.g., the Runaway bride case) since that would not make the matter less notable."


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.