Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murdim Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Murdim Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no sources or evidence of notability Tdslk (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: I couldn't find evidence of notability either. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 06:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete how did this survive since 2009? All I could find is this Rhizome entry, which is more of primary source than actual coverage. It's also barely possible to discern what this Murdim Project is, based on the current article text.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above, not notable. TheImaCow (talk) 10:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is near incomprehensible, there is one source that is user-contributed, the artist doesn't appear to be notable himself. This is not an artwork that has received any critical attention. Vexations (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, wonder how it survived so long. Antila ✉  05:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, no wikiuseable sources found. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.