Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murshad kareem peer syed feroze shah qasmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as a copyright violation. — bbatsell  ¿?   ✍  23:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Murshad kareem peer syed feroze shah qasmi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability, no sources, unencyclopedic writing. This might even be a duplicate of Murshad karim peer syed feroz shah qasmi which I've also nominated for deletion, below. Yilloslime (t) 16:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment There does seem to be an assertion of notability. However, I can imagine that ref's might be hard to find based on a presumably large number of spelling permutations.  B figura  (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Needs sources for claiming to have a significant number of followers, though. --Gwern (contribs) 17:41 15 October 2007 (GMT)
 * Delete. Apparently this guy. Only a few webpages reference this site, none of them reliable sources. Just a non-notable Sufi master. --Dhartung | Talk 17:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No citations or sourcing (article states that the subject "requires no introduction"), definitely not neutral. The author describes "his illustrious majesty" as "the most clairvoyant, sacred, religious and spiritual of this age", a "successor of devout saints", and a person who has "sensible and meditative followers".  This is identical to the other article, except for spelling variations (kareem/karim, feroz/feroze) Mandsford 21:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a copyvio of this | page brought up by Dhartung. I'm going to mark both as such. -- B figura (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.