Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muscular Dystrophy Family Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Muscular Dystrophy Family Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced article. Organisation failing WP:NORG. Google returns 129 results, not a single one pointing to a source independent from the organisation. Given that in this time and age, notable nonprofits tend to have significant online coverage, there is nothing to suggest that Google results are not representative. So, no choice but to delete. — kashmīrī  TALK  14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Checked their latest form 990. Tiny organization, few activities (helped about five people: the biggest expense was getting a van for one of them), niece of president is only salaried employee. No hope of WP:NORG. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:NORG. The listed sources are; (1) the subject's own website, (2) a highly patronizing "human interest" story in a local newspaper which barely mentions the subject, (3) a blatantly inspiration porn piece by Readers Digest which contains hardly any information about the subject, (4) another local paper "feel good" story with barely a mention of the subject, and (5) a directory listing. Finally, my Google search delivered nothing better. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.