Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuseScore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Cbrown1023   talk   22:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

MuseScore

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable program - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

MuseScore is worth to be noted in an encyclopedia, especially in wikipedia, because it empowers people to create sheet music. It is open source and free, and therefore perfectly suitable for collaborative editing between musicians. The MuseScore project started as a Linux project almost 7 years ago, but is since last year available on Windows as well. It is being used by many users world wide. Just give the article some time to grow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toemaz (talk • contribs) 18:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make it notable. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, thx for the link, I missed it in the text above. Give me some time to prove it is notable. This whole Wikipedia is quite new to me so it may take some time. Thx Toemaz (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks RS coverage, nn software TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 19:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Of the free scorewriters available for Windows (open or proprietary) MuseScore is the most developed and feature complete. By Travellingcari's criteria Canorus and TuxGuitar would not qualify. NoteEdit and Impro-Visor would squeak by with one news item (see TuxGuitar, Canorus, NoteEdit, and Impro-Visor). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbolton (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Other stuff is not a valid keep reason, maybe the others should be deleted as well TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 03:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: ...maybe the others should be deleted as well... Okay. Done, done, done, and done! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I disagree with the non-notable aspect of the arguments, which actually is the whole argument, because the software has in fact been noted. Close though.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.