Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Creative Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 21:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Muse Creative Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for a new award. I'm finding press releases, brief mentions, and primary coverage from e.g. winners. Looks like this was its first year. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 05:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 05:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 05:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 05:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Suggest to keep. This article seems to be new, but if you are suggesting to delete this article, the articles below are also should be considered for deletion too as they have a few more same issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADDY_Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caddy_Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowbar_Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMACS_Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunn_Report https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tracy_Awards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effie_Award https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai_Lynx_International_Advertising_Festival — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.88.17 (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * If those should be nominated for deletion, anyone (including yourself) can do so. That other stuff exists is not itself an argument to keep, though. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Found some articles published by third party and I believe you should reconsider singling the Muse Awards out for deletion. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tane-digital-video-wins-two-203300058.html http://www.converternews.com/wow-design-bags-a-gold-at-the-muse-creative-awards-2016/ http://www.akbizmag.com/Media-Arts/Mad-Dog-Graphx-Wins-Nine-in-Muse-Creative-Awards http://www.campaignbriefasia.com/2016/06/wow-design-india-collects-gold.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo NKD (talk • contribs) 04:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Press releases are not reliable sources. The first two and the last two even contain duplicate language. &mdash; <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;"> Rhododendrites <sup style="font-size:80%;">talk  \\ 14:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

So are you pointing at news like Yahoo is not filtering their release and only Wiki is filtering it? And all content in Wiki are originally written without a support of press release, and every interview, media mentioned in news are being written voluntary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo NKD (talk • contribs) 10:04, 21 June 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as there's still nothing convincing, too advertorial and none of the contents are overall convincing. Nothing to suggest the needed substantial independent notability.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Such awards need to be notable by virtue of the organization, on the one hand, and coverage of the award on the other. I see nothing here on either side. Drmies (talk) 03:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I am new to wiki. After look at all conversations here, i think please be fair and don't singling out only one award. Since all of you are the expert and wiki patriot, you can help to comment on those that have similar problem too. If they can stay in wiki for so long, i don't see any problem with Muse that have even more information to share here: Caddy_Awards, Crowbar_Awards, DMACS_Awards, Gunn_Report, The_Tracy_Awards, Effie_Award, Dubai_Lynx_International_Advertising_Festival, ADDY_Awards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.123.206 (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In Wikipedia jargon, this is what's known as an "other stuff exists" argument. The standard answer would be to say that if there are others which don't meet the requirements, you or someone else can nominate them. This is not the only award article being deleted. You simply wouldn't see the articles for others that were. Each article has to stand on its own. But it's true that some of those should be deleted, too. I've even proposed one for deletion myself. &mdash; <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;"> Rhododendrites <sup style="font-size:80%;">talk  \\ 12:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Rhododendrites, I looked at a couple myself. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.