Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Paintbar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Muse Paintbar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional work excluded by both points of WP:N: the coverage it has is lacking in-depth, overwhelmingly local, and not intellectually independent. Additionally, it reads as an advertisement and also bears all the signs of a commissioned work, making it excluded by WP:NOTSPAM, and failing the second prong of what the notability guideline requires beyond the GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Irrespective of the spamminess of the article, this is not a notable business. The only non-local source, the NY times, is an article about the whole ghastly concept.TheLongTone (talk) 13:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Promotionalism only on a nn private company. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability. Wikipedia is not a marketing or advertising platform nor an alternative to a corporate website. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.