Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuseumTour

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:45, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

MuseumTour
Advertising. Article created by ad-spamming IP 66.213.197.74, probably permablocked User:MuseumTour trying to circumvent his block. Phils 08:14, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * hmmm, suspicious, yesss, it must be Deleted, yesss... Master Thief Garrett 08:40, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert, does not show signs of sufficient influence, significance, originality, etc. etc. required for a business to warrant an article. Average Earthman 08:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this advertisement.Naturenet 09:25, 19 May 2005 (UTC); yes, even after revision. Naturenet 17:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advert --TimPope 09:32, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:02, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I cannot find any credible third party references to verify that this business is noteworthy. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 10:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nausea-inducing advertising on the verge of spam. Geogre 11:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Well all I can say is that companies are starting to use Wikipedia to promote their brands . --IncMan 18:25, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've removed the advertising copy from the article. Unfortunately, there isn't an article anymore. --Carnildo 23:14, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Good Job . The topic is just worth a sentence . --IncMan 14:52, May 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete spam. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 14:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.